Backup and Disaster Recovery

Almost every organisation has backups. Far fewer have ever restored one. The gap between a backup job reporting success and a business actually recovering is where most disaster recovery plans fail, and it is only discovered at the worst possible moment. We design against recovery objectives the business has agreed, then prove them by restoring.

1

Assess

What downtime actually costs

2

Design

RPO and RTO per system

3

Implement

Backup and replication

4

Test

Restore, do not assume

5

Report

Runbooks and evidence

How We Approach It

01

Business Impact and Recovery Objectives

Recovery design starts with the business, not the technology. We establish what each system costs the organisation per hour of downtime and how much data loss is tolerable, which produces the recovery objectives everything else is built against.

02

Backup Design and Implementation

Design follows the objectives. Systems with a one hour recovery point need a different approach from those where a nightly job is sufficient, and paying for the former across the whole estate is waste.

03

Offsite and Immutable Copies

A backup on the same infrastructure as the system it protects is not a backup. Ransomware specifically targets backup repositories, which is why at least one copy has to be immutable and out of reach of a compromised domain.

04

Restore Testing

This is the part that gets skipped. We restore on a schedule and record the result, because a job reporting success proves the job ran, not that the data is usable.

05

Runbooks and Reporting

Recovery should not depend on who is available. We document the runbook step by step, keep it current, and report backup health monthly so problems surface before they matter.

What You Receive

Indicative Timeline

Design and implementation normally runs three to six weeks depending on data volumes and how much has to be seeded offsite. The initial full copy to an offsite location is frequently the longest single step.

Technology We Deploy

We hold partner accreditation with the vendors below and deploy their products in client environments.

Veeam

Backup, replication and recovery orchestration, including immutable repositories and automated restore verification.

HPE

Server and storage infrastructure underpinning on premise backup targets and hybrid recovery.

Immutable Storage

Write once repositories that a compromised administrator account cannot alter or delete.

Cloud Replication

Offsite copies held in a separate cloud region so a site level event does not take the recovery copy with it.

Microsoft 365

Backup of mail, files and collaboration data, which the platform retention policy alone does not fully cover.

Monitoring

Alerting on failed and missed jobs, because a backup that silently stopped is worse than none at all.

Frequently Asked Questions

Because having backups and being able to recover are different things. The common findings are backups sitting on the same infrastructure as production, retention that does not match any agreed objective, and a restore that has never once been tested.

Recovery point objective is how much data you can afford to lose, measured in time. Recovery time objective is how long you can afford to be down. They are business decisions, not technical ones, and every design choice follows from them.

It is a major part of it. Modern ransomware deliberately targets backup repositories first, which is why immutable copies separated from production authentication matter more than backup frequency.

Generally yes. The platform protects against its own infrastructure failure, not against a user deleting a mailbox, a malicious insider, or a retention policy that expires data you later need.

On an agreed schedule, typically quarterly for critical systems with a full exercise annually. Every test is recorded with the time taken, so you can demonstrate the objective is actually met rather than merely documented.

Usually. Where the existing product meets the objectives we configure and manage it rather than replace it. Replacement is proposed only where the current tool genuinely cannot meet an agreed recovery objective.

Related Services

This sits inside our Managed ICT Services practice. Related work: ICT Audit where recovery capability has to be independently tested, and Cyber Security Assessments for the ransomware exposure backups exist to survive.

Discuss backup and recovery