Cloud Migration and Infrastructure

Cloud migration is sold as a cost saving and frequently delivers the opposite, because workloads get moved as they are rather than assessed first. Some things belong in the cloud, some are cheaper where they are, and a few should be retired instead of migrated. We establish which is which before anything moves, then schedule the work around your reporting calendar rather than through it.

1

Assess

What should move at all

2

Model

Honest running cost

3

Design

Target architecture

4

Migrate

In waves, reversibly

5

Optimise

Tune once it is live

How We Deliver

01

Cloud Readiness Assessment

We inventory the estate and assess each workload separately. Applications with licensing tied to physical hardware, systems with latency sensitive local dependencies and platforms approaching end of life all warrant different decisions.

02

Cost Modelling

Cloud cost is consumption based, which makes it easy to underestimate. We model the running cost against actual usage rather than nominal capacity, and include the items people forget: egress, backup storage, and the non production environments.

03

Target Architecture Design

We design the destination before moving anything, covering environment separation, network design, identity and the backup arrangement. Access control designed after migration is access control that will produce an audit finding.

04

Phased Migration

Migration runs in waves, lowest risk first, with each wave verified before the next begins. Timing is planned around month end and year end rather than into them, and each wave keeps a defined rollback route.

05

Optimisation and Handover

Consumption based infrastructure sized on day one is almost always wrong by month three. We right size against observed usage, then hand over documentation and the cost monitoring your team needs.

What You Receive

Indicative Timeline

Assessment and cost modelling take two to four weeks. Migration itself depends entirely on the estate, from a few weeks for a handful of workloads to several months for a full data centre exit delivered in waves.

What We Address

Migration is judged on cost, risk and auditability together, because improving one at the expense of the others is not a saving.

Workload Suitability

Whether each application benefits from moving, stays put, or should be retired instead.

Cost Transparency

Modelled running cost including the storage, transfer and non production items usually omitted.

Environment Separation

Development, test and production kept genuinely separate, which is a standing audit expectation.

Identity and Access

Access designed in rather than retrofitted, including privileged access and multi factor authentication.

Backup and Recovery

Recovery objectives agreed and configured, not inherited by accident from a provider default.

Exit Position

What it would take to leave, documented up front so the decision stays reversible.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sometimes, and not automatically. Lifting a workload unchanged usually costs more than the server it replaced. Savings come from right sizing, retiring what is unused and moving from capital to operating expenditure. The cost model tells you before you commit rather than after.

The infrastructure is generally more secure than most on premise environments. The risk shifts to configuration: exposed storage, over privileged accounts and absent multi factor authentication. That is why access design happens before migration, not after.

POPIA permits cross border transfer under specific conditions, including where the destination has comparable protection. Region selection is a design decision we raise at architecture stage, and the compliance position should be confirmed with your legal advisors.

Hybrid is a legitimate destination rather than a failure. Some workloads stay on premise for licensing, latency or cost reasons, and the architecture covers connectivity between the two rather than pretending everything moved.

Each wave keeps a rollback route until it is verified. Longer term, we document the exit position up front so leaving remains a commercial decision instead of a technical impossibility.

Your team, with the documentation and runbooks handed over, or ourselves under a managed arrangement quoted separately. Cost monitoring matters either way, because consumption billing punishes inattention.

Related Services

This sits inside our Systems Development practice. Related work: Managed ICT Services to run the environment afterwards, and Disaster Recovery and Continuity Review to verify recovery independently once migrated.

Discuss a cloud migration