Grant and Donor Fund Verification

Funders attach conditions and then want evidence the money went where it was supposed to. A general purpose audit rarely answers that, because the question is not whether the financial statements are fairly stated but whether each rand was spent on something the agreement permitted. We verify expenditure against the funding agreement itself rather than against a template, and report factual findings on what we find.

1

Read

The agreement itself

2

Map

Conditions to testing

3

Test

Eligibility per item

4

Reconcile

Fund by fund

5

Report

In the funder format

How We Verify

01

Reading the Funding Agreement

We start with the agreement, not the ledger. Eligible cost categories, procurement obligations, co funding requirements and reporting deadlines all sit in the contract, and each generates a testable condition.

02

Mapping Conditions to Procedures

Each condition becomes a procedure. Where the funder prescribes a report format or specific terms of reference, we work to theirs rather than substituting our own, because a report in the wrong format gets returned.

03

Eligibility Testing

We test expenditure against the permitted categories, which is where most findings arise. Costs that are perfectly legitimate for the organisation may still be ineligible under a specific grant.

04

Fund Reconciliation

Grant funds must be traceable separately even where they sit in a common bank account. We reconcile receipts, expenditure and the closing position, including any unspent balance subject to return.

05

Reporting

In the funder format, with findings expressed in the terms the agreement uses. Where expenditure is ineligible, we quantify it plainly, because a report that obscures a problem damages the relationship more than the finding does.

What You Receive

Indicative Timeline

A single verification engagement typically takes one to three weeks depending on transaction volume and how well grant expenditure was tracked separately during the year. Funder deadlines usually drive the schedule.

What Funders Typically Require

Requirements vary by funder, and reading the agreement is the only reliable way to establish them.

Eligible Costs

Testing that expenditure falls within the permitted categories, the most common source of findings.

Procurement

Whether the funder procurement rules were followed, which frequently differ from your own policy.

Separate Accounting

Whether grant funds were tracked separately and can be traced through the accounting records.

Co Funding

Whether the matching contribution was made and can be evidenced, not merely committed.

Asset Register

Whether assets bought with grant funds are recorded and, in some agreements, ownership on completion.

Unspent Funds

The closing balance, interest earned, and whether either must be returned to the funder.

Frequently Asked Questions

Because it answers a different question. An annual audit opines on whether the financial statements are fairly stated. A funder wants to know whether their money was spent on eligible items in accordance with their agreement, which the annual audit does not test.

Ineligible expenditure, usually because a cost that is entirely legitimate for the organisation was not permitted under that specific grant. Salary allocations and overhead apportionment are frequent sources.

Only if the agreement says so, and many do. Where it does not, the funds must still be separately identifiable in the accounting records. Tracking them only at year end is where the difficulty starts.

We quantify and report it. The consequence is between you and the funder and commonly involves repayment of the affected amount. Disclosing it plainly protects the relationship better than a report that obscures it and is discovered later.

Yes, and it is usually more efficient since much of the underlying testing overlaps. Each grant still needs its own report against its own agreement, because the conditions and formats differ.

We use theirs. Funder terms of reference override our standard approach, and a report in the wrong format simply gets returned, which costs everybody time.

Related Services

This sits inside our Audit and Assurance practice. Related work: Agreed Upon Procedures where a funder wants verification rather than an opinion, and Financial and Management Accounting for grant accounting during the year.

Discuss a grant verification